![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. Aren't all religions essentially the same? Can't we reduce the major religions to a lowest common denominator, perhaps "The universal fatherhood of God and the universal brotherhood of man?" At their core, aren't all religions really teaching the same thing although their outward trappings may differ? Don't all religious roads, though they differ in route, ultimately arrive at the same place? Some core beliefs of Christianity are listed below. Unless you can locate another religion which shares these beliefs, the answer to the question is "no."
2. Can God's Will be Thwarted? This section of Theology Corner is a systematic, definitive refutation and repudiation of Calvinism based on logic, reason and Scripture, the Achilles tendons of all false teaching. It is aimed at Bible students who think about what they believe and why they believe it; if needed, basic principles of logic can be found in the “Logical Preliminaries” portion of Christian Handbood of Reason and Insight for Scientists and Technologists. This section was written because the foundations of the largest Protestant denomination in America are being undermined by aggressive, relentless infiltration of Reformed Theology. Congregations are asleep in the pews and leaders are kneeling in appeasement as they sacrifice truth at the altar of peace and unity. Denominational split is the most likely outcome because those who reject the following items cannot comfortably commune with those who embrace them:
Can God's will be thwarted? Two diametrically opposed answers are given to this question. Those who believe in accordance with Augustine and Calvin say no. Those who believe in accordance with Arminius and Wesley say yes. The bifurcation begins with the definition of God’s “will.” For the Arminian, “will” means “want, desire or wish” whether used as a noun or verb. For the Calvinist, “will” means “decree or command.” If the God of Calvinism wills a certain event to happen, then it is ordained by His own decree and His desires always come to fruition. The Calvinist subsequently argues that the conditional statement “if B then A” where A = (event happened) and B = (God willed event) can never be false because God’s command can never be overruled. The Arminian claims this statement is false whenever B is true and A is false; this happens when God’s desire is thwarted by rebellion and corruption (Ex 17:7 cf Heb 3:7-9; Eph 4:30). Consider, for example, A = (all men are saved) and B = (God willed all men be saved). The Arminian believes B is true and A is false; God desired all men be saved but many do not accept the gift of salvation. The Calvinist believes B must be false because A is false; God did not command all men be saved otherwise they would have been. But the truth of (God willed all men be saved) is a central motif of Scripture that reflects the very character of God. When a logical inference (B is false) contradicts an explicit, unambiguous, pervasive teaching of Scripture (B is true), we must question the premise from which the inference is made. This premise is the substitution of the word “command” for the word “will.” Perhaps this premise suggests more about the character of the Calvinist than the character of God. The Calvinist takes a second bold step, justified nowhere in Scripture even using his own "puppet master" redefinition of God’s “will.” The Calvinist insists the converse statement “if A then B” where A = (event happened) and B = (God willed event) can also never be false and therefore God did will all happenings. This means all space, time, matter and energy are under the complete autocratic control of God. The heart, intellect, desires and actions of each human and angel were decreed by God before anything existed except the Trinity. The Arminian claims this statement is false whenever A is true and B is false implying God did not will all happenings. Consider, for example, A = (babies were aborted in America) and B = (God willed babies be aborted in America). The Arminian believes A is true and B is false. The Calvinist believes B must be true because A is true. The two conditional statements can be combined as “if A then B and if B then A” to yield the single biconditional expression, “A if and only if B” where A = (event happened) and B = (God willed event). Calvinists have erected a towering theological structure on the creaking foundation of this single statement by insisting it can never be false. In general, a biconditional statement is false when either A is true and B is false or B is true and A is false. But the Calvinist views this particular biconditional expression as a tautology (always true) by insisting A and B must both be true or both be false for every conceivable event. This premise defines A and B as having exactly the same meaning. To think otherwise would be to question the sovereignty of God. The Arminian, however, believes God continually permits this biconditional expression to be true or false without compromising His true sovereignty. This means events happened which God did not will and events failed to happen which God did will. One example of either sends Calvinism to the dust bin. The Calvinist argues that not one speck of space, time, matter or energy can be outside the continual control of God or we have no guarantee that a single promise of God will be fulfilled. It is beyond the wisdom and power of God to create something that He does not meticulously control. The Arminian responds it is difficult to conceive of a less majestic God than One who is self limited to a deterministic mode of relating to His creation. It is hard to conceive of a weaker God than one who would be threatened by events occurring outside of His exhaustive control. What is praiseworthy about controlling events simply because you possess the innate power to do so? In fact, the denial that God can limit Himself if He so chooses constitutes a denial of divine sovereignty. For these reasons, the Arminian rejects: (a) the universal substitution of the word “decree or command” for the word “will” as applied to God and (b) the universal truth of “A if and only if B” where A = (event happened) and B = (God willed event). However, God does insert Himself into His creation whenever He so chooses. Consequently, the Arminian does believe this biconditional expression is, in fact, always true for certain specific individual events and, for these events, “will” does mean “decree or command.” Such events would be impossible without the specific command of God; examples include: (1) a universe that supports intelligent life, (2) the substitutionary atonement, (3) the bodily resurrection, (4) eternal security for the saved and (5) miraculous healing. But the intellect, will and heart of God are not so small that all His desires must become decrees and this biconditional must become true for every conceivable event. Since Christians believe they are created in the image of God, could worshiping a God who gets His way by divine decree inspire the Calvinist to do likewise? For most of us, it is moral and ethical character and not skilled intimidation that elicits praise. What is truly praiseworthy about God’s sovereignty is not that He exercises a power He obviously has, but that, because of His character, He does not exercise all the power He could. Perhaps the greatest testimony to God’s sovereignty is that God created beings who possess the power to say no to Him. As the issue relates to human free will and salvation, the various arguments usually revolve around Total depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace and Perseverance of the saints. However, the ramifications of this issue extend far beyond the salvation of souls. For example, did Satan and other spiritual beings rebel against God’s will in the primordial past and do they now abuse their authority over certain aspects of creation? Does Satan, who holds the power of death (Heb 2:14) and is the prince of this world (John 12:31; 14:30-31; 16:8-11), exercise a pervasive, structural and diabolical influence to the point that the entire creation is in bondage to decay? Should the pain-ridden, bloodthirsty, sinister and hostile character of nature be attributed to Satan and his army, not to God? Is God grieved by what has been done to His creation? Is God permitting, for a time and within limits, certain consequences of rebellion and corruption caused by both fallen angels and the humans who join them? Or, to somehow glorify Himself, did God simply “will” into being a violent, terrifying and carnivorous "mother nature" dominated by parasitic disease, suffering, decay, corruption and diabolical cruelty? In the ensuing 400 years since the 1618 Synod of Dort, the battle between Calvinism and Arminianism has been primarily confined to inconclusive skirmishes in the TULIP field of combat. However, the main force of Calvinism long ago repositioned itself in such documents as the 1646 Westminister Confession and the 1689 London Baptist Confession. The latter document states, for example, “God hath decreed in himself, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and unchangeably, all things, whatsoever comes to pass.” This is just another way of saying: (a) the word “decree” is synonymous with the word “will” as applied to God and (b) the biconditional expression “A if and only if B” where A = (event happened) and B = (God willed event) can never be false. This means A and B must both be true or both be false for every conceivable event. Polemics on the TULIP have become a pedantic distraction from the primary confrontation.As the issue relates to human free will and salvation, Calvinists claim all reality is interlocked in a causal chain leading back to God as the first-cause of all things; but humans are "free," even though they are pre-determined, because their choices are executed "willingly." The Calvinist defines man as a second-cause agent incapable of choosing a path different from that which God would have him choose. Because man doesn't know he is being manipulated, he believes himself to be a first-cause agent making free will decisions. This is the historic Calvinist concept of "free will." It leads to the idea that absolute determinism by God is compatible with the exercise of free will by man; this concept is sometimes called compatibilism or soft determinism. Arminians agree much of reality is part of a causal chain but claim God does not determine the free will decisions of men or angels. The idea that men and angels are first-cause agents of choice, is a central concept of Arminianism and is sometimes called libertarian freedom. The Arminian believes "free will" makes you a first-cause agent of decisions. The compatibilist believes "free will" makes you a second-cause agent; you have simply been tricked into thinking of yourself as a first-cause agent. These two definitions of free will are mutually exclusive. Consider a man who beats his wife, sexually abuses both his daughters and sons, steals from and abuses his parents and subsequently dies without confession of sin, without remorse for his brutality, without repentance and without asking for the mercy of God. The compatibilist claims each one of these events is God's will because God's sovereignty requires complete determinism of all things; God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass. The man may think he is acting freely but he is actually executing a sinister puppet dance, with God pulling the strings from behind His transcendence. However, the man is fully responsible for his second-cause sins since they were executed willingly. The Arminian claims not one of these sins was God's will and God grieves deeply over each of them. Each sin represents a free will decision by a first-cause agent and is contrary to God's will. God permits, within limits and for a time, the consequences of rebellion but He is deeply grieved by the evil world in which we live. The Arminian believes the Calvinist concept of compatibilism is actually incompatible with God's attributes of holiness, justice, goodness and truth and with the clear teaching of Scripture:
The historic Calvinist responds that we must not expect the holiness, justice and goodness of God will always make sense to our limited intellect. Furthermore, true free will can be exercised by second-cause agents; this central concept of historic Calvinism may be logical nonsense to man but not to God who reasons on a higher level using a different kind of logic. As a source of confusion on this issue, some modern Calvinists seem to view man as a first-cause agent of choice thereby abandoning the historic Calvinist concept of compatibilism. Once again, however, God is viewed as operating with some higher level of logic so the thesis (God as first-cause agent corresponds to man as first-cause agent) only seems to be a paradox but is not a paradox to God. Finally,
the Calvinist asserts the full weight of Scripture is on his side.
However, the Arminian believes the character of God, which emerges from
the Bible taken in its entirety as opposed to text out of context, is
inconsistent with Calvinism. For example, the Calvinist contends regeneration precedes faith
because God elected only certain specific persons for salvation. These persons alone are unconditionally and irresistibly regenerated by the
power of the Holy Spirit and subsequently demonstrate repentance, faith and obedience. The rest of mankind is condemned to
everlasting punishment. This brutal
plan somehow allows God to glorify Himself as He rejoices in its execution. To keep this theology afloat, however, the
Calvinist must twist Scripture, including the text around the following verses,
like Third Reich clergy twisted the Cross into a Swastika.
Does the theology you adopt on this issue have any consequences for your daily Christian walk? When the eyes of your heart look toward the Holy Spirit, you are looking through a lens which has been shaped by some sort of Calvinism or Arminianism. The face of the Person you see looking back is focused by that lens. The Calvinist sees the face of a God who condemned the greater part of mankind to eternal damnation before the universe was formed. The Arminian sees a God who desires all to receive the great gift of salvation. However, the greatest havoc created by the “blueprint” theology of Augustine, Calvin and their theological progeny may be a distortion of the purpose of prayer. The Calvinist believes God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass. If, before the universe was formed, God unchangeably ordained everything, then your prayers can change the outcome of nothing. In contrast, the Arminian believes God always responds. Prayer always makes a difference. But the difference is not always dramatic and obvious because prayer does not cancel or suspend the particular network of constraints which are bringing some outcome into being. Prayer is the means through which the specific action of God works in and through that network, bringing some succession of events to what will always be a different outcome from what it would otherwise have been. This fact alone should make you come alive with commitment to prayer. If the Triune God truly ordained all future events before forming the universe then God may be angered by Arminians who consider this particular view of sovereignty as inconsistent with the Biblical presentation of God's character. Scripture is silent on the consequences of such a theological error. Alternately, if Calvinism is a theological error, the consequences of embracing and promulgating this error are given with somewhat greater clarity. By the 1646 Westminster Confession (God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass) and the 1689 London Baptist Confession (God hath decreed in himself, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and unchangeably, all things, whatsoever comes to pass), God is the first-cause of all evil. All tragedy, suffering, disease, decay, iniquity, corruption, immorality, wickedness and depravity covering the manifold of sin in heaven and earth were willed by God before anything existed except the Trinity. Injustice also reigned since the greater part of mankind was predestined to eternal damnation by God's decree before the universe was formed (Mat 7:13, 14). Matthew 12:31, 32 and Mark 3:29, 30 present the "unpardonable sin" of blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Attributing, to Satan, Christ's authenticating miracles, done in the power of the Holy Spirit, is one path to blasphemy. What about attributing Satan's evil to the Holy Spirit? Is that less heinous than attributing the Holy Spirit's goodness to Satan? Might that be another path to blasphemy? Is Calvinism just one more arrogant theology concocted by a few Christian elite to create an "elect" aristocracy or is it blasphemy at its core? How could Augustine, Calvin and their theological progeny embrace such a grievous error? According to John Wesley's "Serious Considerations on Absolute Predestination": "This doctrine is novel. In the first four hundred years after Christ, no mention is made of it by any writer, great or small, in any part of the Christian Church. The foundations of it were laid in the later writings of Augustine, when unguardedly writing against Pelagius. It was afterward taught by Dominicus, a popish friar, and the monks of his order, and at last, it was unhappily taken up by John Calvin." Wesley goes on to say:
In contrast to Calvinism, Wesley affirmed that God has willed all to be saved and sacrificed his unique Son on the cross so that the great gift of salvation would be available to all mankind. There is hardly any other article of the Christian faith so frequently, plainly and positively asserted. It is that which makes the preaching of the gospel 'Glad tidings to all.' Had this offer of salvation been confined to a few, it would be 'Sad tidings of great sorrow' to most people. But who was John Calvin the man? Some pastors and scholars claim he was the most brilliant Christian theologian since Paul the apostle. They extol his Institutes of the Christian Religion as the definitive work that most influenced their Christian formation. Before enshrining him on the throne of theological greatness, however, should we not examine his life to see if he walked the talk? If you were inclined to follow the leadership of Mary Baker Eddy, Charles Taze Russel, Joseph Smith, Sun Myung Moon, Charles Sherlock Fillmore, Victor Paul Wierwille or Herbert Armstrong, would you not first examine their fruit? What about Martin Luther, Aurelius Augustinus, Jacobus Arminius and John Wesley? Do any of these men get a free pass on behavior? John Calvin secured a theocratic vice grip on Geneva in 1541. Failure to join the “elect” aristocracy was hazardous to your health if you lived in Geneva. Calvin had no love, compassion, patience or tolerance for anyone who objected to the teachings in his Institutes of the Christian Religion or who refused to submit to him personally. Criticism of his teaching was considered heresy for which the sentence was death. In the ensuing years, he presided over approximately 58 executions, 76 exiles and numerous commitments to prison. Most of the hapless victims had dared to be critical of Calvin or his theology but the executions included about 34 women burned at the stake for witchcraft. For the burning execution of Michael Servetus, Calvin suggested that his men use green wood for the fire because it burned slower. Servetus was screaming as he was literally baked alive from the feet upward and suffered the heat of the flames for 30 minutes before finally succumbing. John Calvin was a diabolically cruel dictator incapable of Christian kindness, mercy or love. Do you believe God plucked a pitiless, ruthless, merciless and brutal man from the dust bin of history to resurrect and extrapolate a theology dormant for eleven centuries, a theology not found in the Christian Church for the first 400 years after Christ? But if not God, what other powerful authorities might have been instrumental in the empowerment of John Calvin? Some independent churches and many entire denominations (i.e. Presbyterian, Anglican) are founded on Calvinism. They view themselves as the keepers of orthodoxy for the Protestant Reformation which most Protestants view as the event in Christian history that rescued the church from the corruption of Roman Catholicism. Curiously, key personalities of the Reformation (i.e. Calvin and Luther) were at least as sinister, diabolical and cruel as those they sought to replace. Other churches (i.e. Nazarene, Wesleyan) completely reject Calvinism. Still others (i.e. Calvary Chapel, Bob Jones) refuse to take a position because they believe only God comprehends the meaning of His own sovereignty. The Southern Baptist Convention is bipolar on this issue and, like a great pendulum, is slowly swinging back toward its Calvinist roots. Southern Baptist congregations are discouraged, by pastors, from even discussing Calvinism. Anyone who raises the issue risks being labeled as “divisive” or “having an agenda.” Meanwhile, Southern Baptist Seminaries and Bible Colleges are funneling a new generation of Calvinist pastors into the denomination. The upper echelon elite in the Southern Baptist hierarchy are essentially conducting a great twenty first century experiment to make Calvinism and Arminianism co-exist in a single denomination. History does not bode well for success but failure portends denominational split. SBC Seminaries and Bible Colleges are riddled with Calvinist faculty sending a steady stream of Calvinist pastors into predominately Arminian congregations. If the Calvinist pastor has the courage of his convictions and tells the truth about his beliefs, he will either fail to find employment or split a church. A new strategy has evolved based on stealth, subterfuge, deceit, guile and duplicity employed, of course, with God's approval for the "greater good." This strategy is to suppress the issue of Calvinism/Arminianism in all local churches. If the topic surfaces in a church in spite of the pastor's best efforts to suppress it, he may try to convince the congregation that each individual's choice is simply a matter of personal preference, like whether to wear brown shoes or black shoes to church; no one must be allowed to express the possibility that Calvinism is blasphemy at its core. Because some local churches may see through this subterfuge, other strategies have been introduced with the hope of "tap dancing" around the core conflicts. These strategies include: (1) undermine all discussion and teaching on this issue and thereby maintain a level of ignorance within congregations and particularly within pastor search committees, (2) subordinate the importance of this issue to church growth, music, other entertainment and family ministries, (3) argue that the seriousness of the conflict is contrived in the sense that an Arminian pastor is really no different than an evangelical Calvinist pastor who believes in unconditional election, limited atonement and irresistible grace, (4) utilize Seminaries and Bible Colleges to convert Christians to Calvinists, (5) avoid Articles of Faith that clarify the denominational position, (6) assert the simultaneous validity of both Calvinism and Arminianism using a type of logic popular among intellectual elite called “positive tolerance,” (7) claim to be above the fray by just “believing in the Bible” and (8) assert the sovereignty of God and the free will of man are like two parallel lines that meet at infinity. The true battle lines have been drawn, however, and do not meet at infinity. The Calvinist believes, “God did will all happenings.” The Arminian believes, “God did not will all happenings.” One is true, the other is false.One strategy is particularly popular with pastors who come from Calvinist leaning seminaries unaffiliated with the SBC. These pastors claim to have reservations about both Calvinism and Arminianism. They embrace a synthesized theology that does not diminish the meticulous “sovereign” control of God but does permit free will by man. These modern Calvinists seem to view man as a first-cause agent of choice thereby abandoning the historic Calvinist concept of compatibilism. God is viewed as operating with some higher level of logic so the thesis (God as first-cause agent corresponds to man as first-cause agent) only seems to be a paradox but is not a paradox to God. This Hegelian dialectic synthesis is intellectually propped up by insisting we should not try to resolve theological tensions that the Bible itself does not resolve. These pastors embrace the mystery of “Biblical Tension” which they attribute to God’s lack of clarity. They can consequently embrace the following statements even when these statements seem to be inconsistent with Scripture: (1) events happen only according to God’s sovereign will, (2) God’s will can never be thwarted, (3) you cannot have faith unless you have first been born again, (4) most souls never have an opportunity for salvation, (5) God is the first-cause of all evil and (6) your prayers can change the outcome of nothing. Unfortunately, this intellectually sounding solution is empty as a gun barrel. The co-existence of Calvinism and
Arminianism in a single denomination is being orchestrated by SBC upper echelon
elite under the guise of peace and unity.
They believe success might be possible but only if a substantial level
of ignorance, on the Calvinism/Arminianism issue, is maintained within local
church congregations. They know a church
will be fundamentally divided if the congregation repudiates
the following items while church leaders embrace them:
One alternative to the plan of maintaining congregational ignorance is for the upper echelon elite to “man-up” to what they believe as individuals and have an open debate within the SBC. The associated risk is that a protracted struggle could damage a denomination which has already reached a membership plateau and begun the inexorable decline. A preferred alternative might be to actually educate congregations about this issue and let local churches decide for themselves. This is a moral and ethical option which relies on the “soul competency and priesthood of believers” and confirms the autonomy of the local church. A local church could decide, for example, to designate itself as “non-Calvinist” meaning, in that church, Calvinism is rejected by the leadership. Another church could designate itself as “Calvinist” meaning church leaders embrace Calvinism. Currently, neither Christian nor “seeker” can confidently determine the position of a particular Southern Baptist church on this issue without conducting an extensive investigation. For example, a church may have a non-Calvinist pastor but several Calvinist Sunday school teachers. Or a church may have a Calvinist pastor because his true theology was concealed from a non-Calvinist search committee. In particularly insidious cases, Calvinist “power players” bide their time until their non-Calvinist pastor departs and then quietly sneak a Calvinist pastor through the side door. In each of these examples, is the church Calvinist or non-Calvinist? Would the congregation know? Unfortunately, most Southern Baptist congregations are far too uninformed to recognize deceitful and duplicitous conduct by a few members of their own leadership. In any case, the proponents of Calvinism, hiding in and behind Seminaries and Bible Colleges, cannot allow local churches to openly discuss and debate this issue because these proponents fear the outcome. Similarly, most opponents of Calvinism, both pastors and laypersons, simply lack the courage to raise this issue in their local churches. Ironically, local congregations of any non-Calvinist church, if given a choice, almost never choose the framework of Calvinism to define their theological beliefs. Calvinism usually makes its way into the Church via the vehicle of a new pastor or small group of elders infused with Calvinism by a Bible College or Seminary. The full face of Calvinism is never taught or preached by these infiltrators because the greater portion of the congregation would find it offensive. Nevertheless, theological threads will gradually be woven into the preaching and teaching of the church. For example, the tragic death of a child may be framed by saying, "Although we don't understand, we must accept God's will in the death of this child." The great Southern Baptist cruise ship is steaming on a long journey somewhere in the North Atlantic. The passengers are sleeping in deck chairs, stuffing themselves from an endless buffet, enjoying a wide variety of entertainment and wallowing in ritual and tradition. Cheerful crew members prance through the corridors chanting peace and unity like left over flower children from the 60’s. But behind the façade, the ship’s officers are not united. Some would like to take over the ship in a quiet mutiny of stealth, subterfuge and deceit to make sure the “elect” aristocracy on board can occupy the special peerage they deserve. These officers claim to have privileged information indicating the lower class passengers must never be permitted to disembark at the same port as the elect aristocracy. The lower class passengers don’t know it yet, but they will be dumped off the ship at an unpleasant location which doesn’t appear on their itinerary. But the mutinous officers say that’s what these sorry reprobates have deserved from the time they left port. Many of the remaining officers are troubled by this plan particularly since some of the reprobates might be pastors, deacons and Sunday school teachers. But these officers are afraid to speak up for fear of being “divisive.” They have been intimidated into believing that shipboard peace and unity must be preserved. While all this melodrama is taking place, a few of the intimidated officers have noticed that the ship is headed for an iceberg only a few nautical miles off the starboard bow. Like the Titanic, the great ship may shear in half before sinking thousands of fathoms into the icy darkness never to be seen again. If only the sleeping passengers would awaken and exert their authority in time to avert disaster. Should the intimidated officers risk disunity by taking command of the ship, alerting passengers to the imminent danger and working with them to restore the ship to its proper course? What would Jesus do? Did Jesus and the apostles sacrifice truth on a glorified altar of peace and unity (Mat 10:34; 1 John 4:1-4; 2 Pet 2:1)? Is the history of the Christian church one of theological appeasement (1 Thes 5:21)? Did the church welcome the beliefs of the Gnostics, Docetists, Ebionites, Arians, Apollinarians, Nestorians, Eutychians and Sabellians in the name of peace and unity?What is the position of your church on Calvinism? What is your position? If Calvinism is making uninvited, ninja-like infiltrations into your church or denomination and you decide to stand against it, be prepared for certain tactics frequently utilized by those who believe Calvinism should, for the greater good, dominate or at least co-exist. Once the core conflicts of Calvinism/Arminianism can no longer be suppressed by clever strategies, the proponents of Calvinism will generally maneuver from a tactical playbook that includes some of the following items:
The opponents of Calvinism need
only three items.
3. What is the source of evil? Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People? One proposed answer starts with the theodicy premise, "If a person is righteous and God is all-powerful, just and good then the person will not suffer" which is of the form "if (x and y) then not-z." Taking the contrapositive, "if z then (not-x or not-y)," yields "if a person suffers then the person is not righteous or God is not all-powerful, just and good." We all know persons whose godliness is genuine, whose moral character is upright and who, though not sinless, have kept themselves from great transgression, but who nonetheless suffer bitterly. Since the Christian God is all-powerful, just and good, it follows that such persons are not righteous. The problem with this logic is the theodicy premise itself; the premise is false and all conclusions drawn from it are false! Another proposed answer is that evil is God's will. The Calvinist reasons that God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass. This includes all kinds of evil! When a cleric officiating at the funeral of someone who has died a tragic death intones, "We must accept this tragedy as the will of God," he is attributing this tragic death to the immutable will of a holy and loving God. Other proposed answers include:
Consider this option. God created angels and humans as first-cause agents with the free will to choose or reject love in every situation. Within limits and for a time, God will permit the consequences of these choices; otherwise, free will is an illusion. God is infinitely, eternally and immutably good and will immediately prevent any evil except that which results from the free will decisions of angels and humans. Therefore, rebellious angels and humans are the first-cause agents of all existing evil. Satan, the ruler of rebellious angels, is the prince of this world and all creation groans under his iron fist. 4. Is Christianity Compatible with Positive Tolerance? The conclusion that "Jesus is God" is a natural consequence of classical logic based on the evidence of Scripture, tradition (history) and personal experience. Some in our time fail to be convinced by classical logic because of positive tolerance, a concept taught in many educational institutions and through the media. Positive tolerance is a construction of Hegelian dialectic reasoning in which we synthesize that both a theses and its antithesis are true. In other words, (a is b) is true and (a is-not b) is true; (Jesus is God) is true and (Jesus is-not God) is true. This means every individual's beliefs, values, lifestyle and truth claims are equally valid. Not only does everyone have an equal right to his beliefs but all beliefs are equally true. I may believe (Jesus is God) but I must also believe (Allah is God), (Buddha is God), (Brahman is God) and (God is a fictitious being). The concept of positive tolerance is incompatible with logic and reason. One of God's attributes is absolute truth; positive tolerance is absolute lie. Holiness is the attribute of God which permeates all other attributes. It is the state of who He is and the act of what He does; it is absolute purity of will, intellect, heart and action. Certain words such as love, integrity, righteousness, sanctification, morality, ethics and character, have no meaning aside from the holiness of God. Holiness makes God perfect in being, wisdom, power, justice, goodness and truth. Since man is created in God's image, every human possesses a soul comprising a will, intellect and heart and every human is capable of action. As with God, holiness in man is both state and act. My state is holy if my will, intellect and heart conform respectively to the will, intellect and heart of God. My acts are holy if they flow from a holy state and are the acts God would do in my place. Sin is all things not holy. The state of my will, intellect and heart is either holy or sinful; my acts are either holy or sinful. The intersection of sin and holiness is the null or empty set. Holiness and sin are disjoint sets or mutually exclusive events in the sample space of all possible states and actions. Although much of reality is part of a causal chain, God does not determine my free will decisions and I will not always select the path of holiness. Also, my intellect is finite, my wisdom is flawed and I am fully capable of justifying sin by logic and reason. Finally, my human heart is deceitfully wicked and cannot be trusted (Gen 6:5; Ps 14:1; Prov 12:15, 14:12, 20:9; Isa 32:6; Jer 17:9; Mat 15:19; Mark 7:21; John 5:42; Acts 28:27). Given my flawed human soul, how can I ever hope to be holy? I begin by requesting an audience with God and saying, "Father, I come into Your presence confessing I am a sinner, having remorse in my heart, wanting to repent, asking for Your mercy, receiving from You the far greater gift of salvation and believing I am saved by faith, the grace of God and the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ." God responds by giving me the gift of salvation. Part of this gift is the regeneration or initial sanctification of my soul. By this gift, the Holy Spirit makes known to me the will of God and helps me discern truth from lie. He occupies and purifies all the rooms of my heart into which He is invited. For the first time in my life I am not a prisoner of sin. I am free to pursue the path of righteousness. This is the first day of my Christian life. This new life is a daily dying to sin and living to pursue righteousness; it constitutes a life of repentance, faith and obedience continually reaffirmed and renewed. It means allowing my will and intellect to become increasingly aligned with the will and intellect of God. It means letting the Holy Spirit occupy and purify an increasing number of rooms in my heart. It means works of Christian love flow increasingly from a heart that loves God and loves my neighbor. I am now on the path to holiness. How far can I travel along this path of sanctification during my life on earth? Can I achieve, at least for a time:
Can I at least allow the Holy Spirit to occupy and purify nearly every room of my heart? Can my human will be at least somewhat aligned with the will of God? Can my feeble intellect discern at least many important truths? Will the Holy Spirit give me a boost toward the top? Will He occasionally push me up so I can hang from the edge of the precipice? Can I be holy, for a while, until I am, once again, weighed down by my own
causing me to lose my grip and fall
from the heights? Scripture suggests the
possibility of, at least, hanging from the edge of the precipice for a time.
Can persons be easily identified
who have been boosted up to entire sanctification (Christian Perfection) or
have otherwise been given special empowerment by the Holy Spirit to a peerage
above the ranks of the merely saved? Can
some duly elected board of examiners certify such individuals? Some believe the gift of “tongues” is proof
of a particular kind of empowerment.
Others review Scripture covering the twenty “Gifts of the Holy Spirit” (Rom 12:6-8; 1 Cor 12:4-11; 1 Cor 12:28; Eph
4:11) and conclude God:
Perhaps we need to look beyond
denominational certifications, personal claims of holiness and personal
displays of gifts to identify those who have been boosted up to entire
sanctification or have otherwise been given special empowerment by the Holy
Spirit to a peerage above the rank and file Christian. Perhaps we should examine their fruit (Mat
7:16-20; Gal 5:22,23).
6. Are Christians Expected "to do" or Just "to be"? Holiness is the state of who God is and the acts that He does. A state of holiness in humans is characterized by absolute purity of heart, intellect and will. Acts of holiness by humans are frequently called "fruit of the Spirit" (Gal 5:22); they represent acts of Christian love performed by one person and received by another. Christians are expected to reflect God's holiness since we are created in His image (Gen 1:26). In fact, we are specifically commanded to be holy because God is holy (Lev 11:44). What about the option of just "being" in a state of holiness but not "doing" holy acts? For example, I could allocate Sundays for worship and prayer. During the week I could concentrate on avoiding sinful thoughts thereby maintaining the purity of my heart. I could also participate in the church choir and read the Bible regularly. I could even study the deep meaning of Greek and Hebrew text and become skilled at systematic theology and Biblical exegesis. Of course with all this activity, I wouldn't have time to minister to others or be a servant to anyone. Maybe my daily life could serve as a role model for the unsaved but I certainly wouldn't have time to deal with those people directly. Furthermore, my church comprises old time "saints of God" and is just the right size. There is no need to be discipled or to disciple others in my church; we are beyond that sort of thing. The commandments in Scripture stand in sharp contrast to the option embraced in the previous paragraph. Read the following passages and judge for yourself: Mat 22:36-40; Rom 13:8-10; Gal 5:14; Luke 8:21; Jam 4:17; Eph 4:11-12; John 15:1-2, 8, 13, 16; Mat 7:12, 17-20; Mat 25:14-30. Many say, "I just believe in God! I don't need a theology or doctrine." If this statement encompasses your Christian beliefs then it defines your theology by default. Unfortunately, this statement doesn't put much separation between you and Satan's minions (Jam 2:19). You may say, "I just have faith; I don't need more." In Christianity, faith must be preceded by repentance and followed by obedience. Faith as an intellectual exercise or emotional experience is meaningless. From the moment you are saved by the grace of God and the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ, deeds matter (Jam 2:14-25). Your belief system, or theology, determines your deeds. If you need more detail in your belief system, try the following:
8. What Gifts Does God Give You at the Instant of Salvation? Each person who responds to God's grace (Titus 2:11) and the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ (Rom 5:8; 1 John 2:2) by confession of sin, remorse, repentance, faith and obedience instantly receives the great gift of salvation. This gift includes but is not limited to the following:
9. Why is the Protestant Church Dying in the United States? Available evidence suggests most denominations and individual protestant churches have either reached a plateau or are on the decline in the United States. This country may be only one or two generations behind Europe, Australia, New Zealand and other regions in experiencing the essential death of the church. Why is this happening? Is the church afflicted with some Satanic virus for which there is neither treatment nor cure? Is the reason for this spiral into the abyss some great theological mystery? Chapters 2 and 3 of Ephesians explain that all believers are reconciled with one another and united in the Church of Jesus Christ; authorities in Heaven are observing the church hoping to see the "manifold wisdom of God" at work on earth. To the extent these rulers see a body of believers characterized by:
they see the hand of God working through His church. But what ugly characteristics are these authorities also observing in churches across the United States? The list includes but is certainly not limited to the following items. As you read these items, remember that much is expected from those to whom much has been given (Luke 12:48) and much has been given to America; for the United States, the bar has been raised.
Can a typical "cruise ship" church make a course correction without the captain and his entertainment staff being fired by the passengers or without the pampered passengers abandoning ship? Opportunities and risks abound. Consider, for example, the typical "cruise ship" church worship service consisting of the following time breakdown in minutes:
But what if the ritual prayer, musical entertainment and announcements were replaced by congregational corporate prayer from men and women yearning to be lead by the Holy Spirit down a path of confession, remorse, repentance, faith, obedience, humility, forgiveness, sincerity, purity, persistence, restoration, truth and worship? What if the sermon was intended to make everyone better able to give a reason for the hope that is in us? What if each cruise ship church turned into a real church? Or what if a young pastor, uncorrupted by the professional Christian establishment, decided to make a paradigm shift and insist that all church activities be filtered through the recurrence mnemonic PRTM from the Hebrew "Mem Tav Reysh Pe" meaning most noble prince? PRTM represents a mnemonic for Prayer (Praise, Repentance, Thanksgiving,
Mercy) The response of pastors and other leaders to church decline is generally to continue doing everything the same way but with a doubling of effort. Unfortunately, if you do what you've always done, you get what you always got! Pastors seem to think Jesus will say to them, "Well done my good and faithful servants; the church died but you were all faithful in your efforts. Come to the front of the line." Instead, He might say, "My church died in America on your watch. I am holding you responsible. You have failed to be fruitful." 10. Did God Elect Only a Few for Salvation While Condemning the Greater Part of Mankind to Hell? Arminians believe much of reality is part of a causal chain but many human actions are the result of a first-cause, human free will choice between two or more options. Calvinists believe every event in the universe is under God's "sovereign" control including all actions and thoughts of men and angels. Calvinists say you may think your choices are free but God is really the hidden, first-cause behind every decision you make. Calvinists believe God only ordained a few for salvation while hardening and increasing the damnation of the far greater part of mankind, namely all those who do not believe. The cause of this unbelief is the counsel and decree of God. Calvinism would appear to undermine God's holiness, justice, goodness and truth. But what does Scripture teach? Read the following verses, get a Bible, read the text around each verse and then reach your own conclusion.
The outcome of the great war between good and evil was decided by the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ. But few would claim Jesus has already repossessed and repaired his corrupted creation. For a time and within limits, Jesus continues to permit the consequences of rebellion and the brutal corruption of all life. Look around. Did our good, omnipotent God create the inherently violent and terrifying system we see in nature, a system rife with sickness, suffering and death - a system red in tooth and claw? Does nature itself appear to operate contrary to the character of God? Does the world at every level appear to be at war? Does the world appear to be permeated and corrupted at all levels by an evil influence? Did Jesus believe that someone else had been given authority over this world and Jesus Himself must repossess and repair?
Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. (John 12:31) I will not speak with you much longer, for the prince of this world is coming. He has no hold on me, but the world must learn that I love the Father and that I do exactly what my Father has commanded me. "Come now; let us leave. (John 14:30-31) When he comes, he will convict the world of guilt in regard to sin and righteousness and judgment: in regard to sin, because men do not believe in me; in regard to righteousness, because I am going to the Father, where you can see me no longer; and in regard to judgment, because the prince of this world now stands condemned. (John 16:8-11) The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. And he said to Him, "I will give you all their authority and splendor, for it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. So if you worship me, it will all be yours." Jesus answered, "It is written: Worship the Lord your God and serve him only." (Luke 4:5-8) "Then he will say to those on his left, Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels." (Mat 25:41) We know that we are children of God, and that the whole world is under the control of the evil one. (1 John 5:19) The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (2 Cor 4:4) As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. (Eph 2:1-2) Be self-controlled and alert. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. (1 Peter 5:8) For this reason, when I could stand it no longer, I sent to find out about your faith. I was afraid that in some way the tempter might have tempted you and our efforts might have been useless. (1 Thes 3:5) And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. (2 Cor 11:14) For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. (Eph 6:12) For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God. We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. (Rom 8:20-22) Jesus' earthly ministry reflected the belief that the world had been seized by a hostile, sinister lord. Jesus came to begin the process of repossession and repair. According to Scripture the universe was originally good and the glory of God is still evident in it (Rom 1:20). But something else - something frightfully wicked - is evident in it as well. Of their own free will, Satan and other spiritual beings rebelled against God in the primordial past and now abuse their God-given authority over certain aspects of creation. Satan, who holds the power of death (Heb 2:14) exercises a pervasive, structural, diabolical influence to the point that the entire creation is in bondage to decay. The pain-ridden, bloodthirsty, sinister and hostile character of nature should be attributed to Satan and his army, not to God. 12. What are the Attributes of God? The attributes of God can be characterized by a finite list of words and phrases so long as we agree that when a word or phrase is applied to God, the true depth of meaning cannot be fathomed. Here are a few attributes arbitrarily grouped in seven categories. Feel free to add or rearrange.
The
infinitude of God is a particularly difficult concept for the human mind. What
does it mean to say that God is infinite? How can God be transcendent and
immanent at the same time? How many bits of information can be stored by
God? Would the capacity of God be strained by comprehending
Consider the meaning of
infinity. The smallest infinity is called aleph-null; its cardinality (n)
is the number of elements in the set of all positive integers. This infinity is, by definition,
"countable." After aleph-null, each
element of an infinite set is a subset of elements from its predecessor. The cardinality (number of elements), for each
successive infinity, is the number of subsets in the set of all possible
subsets constructed from its predecessor.
For example, the next infinity after aleph-null is aleph-1 or the
continuum; its cardinality ( n' = 2n ) is the number of subsets in
the set of all possible subsets constructed from the positive integers. This happens to be the same as the number of
elements in the set of all real numbers. Aleph-1 is not countable.
The next infinity is aleph-2; its cardinality ( n'' = 2n' ) is
the number of subsets in the set of all possible subsets constructed from the
real numbers. Consider the possibility that God can easily process
at least n'''''''.... bits of
information where the number of ' marks
is n. What sort of concepts might such a
God view as trivial while they confound the most brilliant human minds?
Perhaps He could determine the precise array of cosmological parameters that
would permit human life to exist in our universe. We exist because:
Significant
deviations would preclude our existence. Other concepts which we view as
mysterious would likewise be trivially non-mysterious to the mind of an
infinite God.
Perhaps
all these things are so trivial to God that they occupy an infinitesimally
small portion of his thoughts. More consuming issues might be the need
for our confession of sin, remorse repentance, faith and obedience. But
wouldn’t the sheer size of the known universe -- 100 billion stars in each of 100
billion galaxies -- overwhelm even the most infinite God? Consider the following hypothetical exercise
just to put things in perspective.
Divide the universe into an ordered (numbered) array of volumes each equal to the cube of the Planck
Length (1.6 x10-35 meter).
These volumes may be visualized as volumetric pixels or “voxels” of variable shape similar to finite elements. Assume the state of each voxel is 1 or
0. Then the state of the entire universe
is defined by a countably infinite sequence of binary digits or, in other words, a single real number. The
possible 3-D geometric arrangements of 1’s and 0’s would be more than
sufficient to accommodate the complexity of any “Theory of Everything” that
might be devised including those based on Lie Group E8 symmetry. Now imagine God allows the state of each voxel to change at time intervals equal to the Planck Time (5.4 x 10-44 seconds). At the end of each time interval, a new real number defines the state of the universe. Nestled among the elements of aleph-3 are particular subsets of aleph-2 that track all possible histories of the universe from the big bang onward. An immanent God would only have to comprehend infinity at a cardinality of n''' to avoid being overwhelmed by this universe. The Christian God understands infinity at least to a cardinality of n'''''''.... where the number of ' marks is n. As an interesting aside, if God decided to increase the velocity of light (c) by a factor of say 100, the length of the basic time interval would be smaller by a factor of 100,000. To a transcendent observer, the universe would be changing 100,000 times faster but no entity inside the universe would sense a difference because the other Planck Units below would have changed accordingly.
God would essentially have the ability to “fast forward” and “slow motion” the universe without leaving any evidence detectible by us. 13. What are the Core Beliefs of Christianity? The Bible is the inspired, infallible and inerrant word of God.
The one true God exists as three distinct, transcendent, immanent, infinite, eternal, and immutable persons: God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.
Some have claimed the Holy Spirit is not a person. This claim is refuted by the following Scriptures: (John 14:26, 15:26, 16:7-11, 14; Acts 5:3, 13:2, 16:7; Rom 8:16, 26; 1 Cor 12:11; Eph 1:14, 4:30)
Every person since Adam and Eve, except Jesus Christ, was born with a sin nature and no person, except Jesus Christ, has lived a sinless life.
The spotless lamb, “without blemish,” was required for the Passover (Ex 12:5) and the words, “without blemish,” constantly recur in the descriptions of the sacrifices which pointed forward to the atonement accomplished by Christ. The Scriptures are completely unanimous in declaring the perfect sinlessness of Christ under all circumstances. The sinlessness of Christ is not merely a personal attribute, characteristic of His human nature as well as His divine nature, but it is an attribute which is absolutely essential to the atonement.
Christian belief must be preceded by repentance and followed by obedience to qualify as faith. Faith is not just an intellectual exercise (Jam 2:19) or an emotional experience (Jer 17:9).
Calvinists reject this doctrine. Calvinists contend regeneration precedes faith because God elected only certain persons for salvation. Those persons alone are regenerated by the power of the Holy Spirit and subsequently demonstrate repentance, faith and obedience. The rest of mankind is condemned to everlasting punishment. Calvinism represents theological error. It is inconsistent with God’s holiness, justice, goodness and truth and it is refuted by Scripture.
14. What is the purpose of prayer? The
"unpardonable sin" of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is defined (Mat
12:31, 32; Mark 3:29, 30) as attributing the goodness of the Holy
Spirit to Satan. Calvinists may have found another path to blasphemy by
attributing all Satan’s evil to God. But the greatest havoc created by
the "blueprint" theology of Augustine, Calvin and their theological
progeny may be a distortion of the purpose of prayer. The Calvinist
believes: "God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy
counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever
comes to pass." If, before the universe was formed, God unchangeably
ordained everything, then your prayers can change the outcome of
nothing. Allow me to suggest another view, one that permeated the
Christian community before the time of Augustine.
Prayer itself frequently
includes:
However, my prayer petitions may
not be granted even if I have the attributes of a prayer warrior and my prayers
are appropriate. For example, I may be
certain my faith is larger than a mustard seed but I cannot move mountains (Mat
17:20 cf 21:21, 22) nor can I place my hands on the sick and see them healed
(Acts 28:8). The Holy Spirit may want to
grant my petitions in such matters but He is thwarted by forces of darkness
exercising free will, using powerful weapons and a utilizing a complex network
of constraints (Dan 10:12-13, 20-21); but also, the Holy Spirit is
thwarted by my own inadequate personal attributes
as a prayer warrior. Curiously, many churches
have little commitment to united corporate prayer and even less
inclination toward confession of individual sin while praying. Prayer
has become a tired ritual, which is performed with no real expectation.
A prayer may be offered during worship service to accommodate
tradition. Then, if nothing happens, some ask, "Whose unconfessed sin
caused God to ignore this prayer?" or "Was this prayer ignored by God
because it was inconsistent with His unchangeable blueprint established
before the world was formed?" Most churches preach and teach the
importance of praying together as a united body of Christ but most
churches seldom do it! It is difficult to identify a church whose
foundation is corporate prayer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||